How many theories and "what ifs" does a theory need before it is scrapped? Since the introduction of and the desperate attempts to force Macro-evolution's validity all they can do is heap one crazy idea and theory upon another. They keep doing this with hopes that the pile will get so huge that no one would ever try to uncover it for what it really is, bad science. Create your hypothesis, test it, if it fails through repeatable testing and observation then reformulate hypothesis and if continues to fail then scrap the theory and move on. Stop the circular nonsense of creating theory after theory in hopes of trying to justify one's insistence that there is no God! Seriously.
This nonsense that iron is the answer is as silly as punctuated equilibrium. Seriously, stop it!
Note of irony: They accuse Christians of faith based ideas? Really? The hypocrisy is indeed ironic.
No comments:
Post a Comment