Actually I know they do not…
Today’s liberals have indeed hijacked more words and have perverted them to accommodate their godless agenda.
There are many today who have jumped on the bandwagon of equivocation. These are the ones who have collectively hijacked the phrase 'pro-choice'.
They use this phrase to mean something that the actual definition and context fully contradicts.
Thus, by using the phrase 'pro-choice', they are guilty of being logically fallacious.
Equivocation is defined simply as the use of ambiguous language to conceal the truth.
When assuming the so-called position of ‘pro-choice’ there is an illusion that this is somehow a positive position and that since one person has a choice somehow it makes it morally right for everyone.
Wrong...
‘Pro-choice’ fails to include everyone involved in the matter. The father and child are not allowed any choices under this ideology. If the father is allowed a choice then it is only because the woman gave him any say in the matter at all.
Thus the position ought to be correctly defined or labeled as “Limited Choice”.
Actually ‘Pro-death’ is more accurate and honest.
This is because if the one person who does have a choice chooses to kill the baby then of course death is actually what is being chosen. That outcome is not positive at all for the baby who had no choice in the matter.
Now the equivocators will continue to delve deeper into their equivocating by screaming “it’s a fetus not a baby (human)!!!” all the while science with the obvious observable evidences is stating the exact opposite.
Please stop this insanity.
Start thinking logically straight and let the babies live!
Just say no to equivocation and say YES to life!
No comments:
Post a Comment